CMAP, the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning GO TO 2040: the official comprehensive planning campaign for metropolitan Chicago
Loading...

Travel Times

Train

by Flickr user Señor Codo

Travel times can be an effective way to judge the efficiency of the transportation system. Time spent traveling is generally viewed as unproductive, so reducing travel times by lowering congestion, speeding transit service, and otherwise improving the transportation system can have positive benefits in a number of areas. This outcome is closely related to the “congestion” and “jobs-housing access” outcomes.

Travel times in this analysis are calculated for both autos and for transit. The numbers used for this analysis include travel times for all trips; work trips usually have longer travel times than non-work trips (shopping, social, etc) because they usually cover longer distances. Currently, average auto travel times are 21.6 minutes and average transit travel times are 33.7 minutes. Both of these are expected to increase according to current trends, with auto travel times increasing to 22.7 minutes and transit travel times to 34.4 minutes.

Auto travel times

The impacts of each scenario on automobile travel times are described below, estimating travel times compared to the current trend (with a decrease considered to be an improvement). The base figure is 22.7 minutes.

  

Scenario How would this scenario change from the current trend? Change in travel times What strategies in this scenario caused this change?
 Reinvest  Improves -14%
(3 minutes less)
Substantial increases in arterial and expressway capacity reduced travel times. Higher densities of development, which reduced distances between destinations, also contributed.
Preserve Worsens slightly

+4%
(1 minute more)

Most transportation strategies in this scenario prioritized other travel modes over autos, with limited change to auto travel times.
Innovate   Mixed results  +12% (3 minutes more) for some users; -10% (2 minutes less) for others Travel conditions were improved using technology and pricing transportation strategies, but this, combined with a low-density land use pattern, led to trips that covered long distances, therefore taking more time. Also, congestion pricing was applied on the region’s expressways; this led to better travel times for people who were willing to pay the additional toll, but worse travel times for others.
 

Transit travel times

The impacts of each scenario on transit travel times are described below, estimating travel times compared to the current trend (with a decrease considered to be an improvement). The base figure is 34.4 minutes

Scenario How would this scenario change from the current trend? Change in travel times What strategies in this scenario caused this change?
 Reinvest  Improves slightly  -9%
(3 minutes less)
Transit-specific capital improvements increased the speed of transit trips. The scenario also included a denser land use pattern which brought origins and destinations closer together.
Preserve Improves slightly -5%
(1 minute less)
Operational transit improvements and other low-capital strategies were applied. These operational improvements, plus a moderately denser land use pattern, increased the use of transit, particular for shorter trips.
Innovate   Improves slightly  -8%
(2 minutes less)
 Travel conditions were improved using technology and pricing transportation strategies, including transit signal priority bus service on arterials and other features of Arterial Rapid Transit (ART), which led to more efficient transit service.
 

These estimates were calculated by using the CMAP travel demand model to estimate the impacts of the strategies in the reports linked above. Documentation of travel demand model features is available here

Was this content helpful?
 Average 0 out of 5
Comments:
Name:
Leave a Comment:
Please enter the text from the image and submit your comment for approval by the moderator.

Loading...

Create your own scenario with

MetroQuest button 170
Explore the scenarios: